MIT Sea Grant Center for Coastal Resources

Aquaculture References

Journal Articles and Books

Allendorf, F.W. 1991. Ecological and genetic effects of fish introductions: synthesis and recommendations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement).

*Baker, B. 1992. Botcher of the bay or economic boon? BioScience 42 (10): 744-747.

*+Baltz, D.M. 1991. Introduced fishes in marine systems and inland seas. Biological Conservation 56: 151-177.

*Beveridge, M.C.M, L.G. Ross, and L.A. Kelly. 1994. Aquaculture amd biodiversity. Ambio 23 (8): 497-502.

Brown, W.Y. 1979. Exotic Species in Mariculture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

*Butler, Declan. 1995. Patent row splits fish identity researchers. Nature 377: 9.

*Ferguson, M.M. 1990. The genetic impact of introduced fishes on native species. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 1053-1057.

*Goulletquer, Philippe and Maurice Heral. 1997. Marine Molluscan Production Trends in France: From Fisheries to Aquaculture. In U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 129: 137-164.

*Hindar, K.N., N. Ryman, and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48: 945-957.

*Kapuscinski, A.R., and E.M. Hallerman. 1991. Implications of introduction of transgenic fish into natural ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (Supplement 1): 99-107.

Kohler, C.C., and W.R. Courtenay Jr. 1986. American Fisheries Society position on introduction of aquatic species. Fisheries 11.

*Krueger, C.C., and B. May. 1991. Ecological and genetic effects of salmonid introductions in North America. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement 1): 66-77.

Leach, J.H., and C.A. Lewis. 1991. Fish introductions in Canada: provincial views and regulations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement).

*Malakoff, David. 1998. Atlantic Salmon Spawn Fight Over Species Protection. Science 279, February 6, 1998: 800.

Paul, Timothy J. Sinnott and Eric. 1993. Non-indigenous aquatic species comprehensive management plan.

*Robinette, H.R., J. Hynes, N.C. Parker, R. Putz, R.E. Stevens, and R.R. Stickney. 1991. Commercial aquaculture. Fisheries 16 (1): 18-22.

*Townsend, C.R., and M.J. Winterbourn. 1992. Assessment of the environmental risk posed by an exotic fish: the proposed introduction of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) to New Zealand. Conservation Biology 6 (2).

Wingate, P.J. 1991. U.S. state's view and regulations on fish introductions, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement).

Government Documents

*Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. 1989. Fisheries Management Report No. 13. p1-5.

The Bureau of Affairs, Inc. 1977. Executive Order 11987 - Exotic Organisms.

*Connecticut Department of Agriculture. 1996. Connecticut laws and practices concerning the transfer and introduction of mulluscan shellfish.

*ICES. 1995. ICES Code of Practice on the Introductins and Transfers of Marine Organisms 1994.

*Massachusettes Division of Marine Fisheries Policy: Acceptable Sources of Molluscan Shellfish for Aquaculture 1996a.

*New York State Coastal Managment Program Summary. p1-4.

*+New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife. 1993. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Comprehensive Management Plan p1-38.


*Indicates MIT Sea Grant has reference on file. Please contact us if you would like a copy.

+ Indicates a large sized document which MIT Sea Grant will send on loan for a short period of time.

 

:: Home :: MIT Sea Grant :: Site Map :: Contact ::
  this page last updated on: 4 December, 2002