Aquaculture References
Journal Articles and Books
Allendorf, F.W. 1991. Ecological and genetic effects of fish introductions:
synthesis and recommendations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries
and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement).
*Baker, B. 1992. Botcher of the bay or economic boon? BioScience
42 (10): 744-747.
*+Baltz, D.M. 1991. Introduced fishes in marine systems and inland
seas. Biological Conservation 56: 151-177.
*Beveridge, M.C.M, L.G. Ross, and L.A. Kelly. 1994. Aquaculture
amd biodiversity. Ambio 23 (8): 497-502.
Brown, W.Y. 1979. Exotic Species in Mariculture. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
*Butler, Declan. 1995. Patent row splits fish identity researchers.
Nature 377: 9.
*Ferguson, M.M. 1990. The genetic impact of introduced fishes on
native species. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 1053-1057.
*Goulletquer, Philippe and Maurice Heral. 1997. Marine Molluscan
Production Trends in France: From Fisheries to Aquaculture. In U.S.
Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 129: 137-164.
*Hindar, K.N., N. Ryman, and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of
cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal of
Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48: 945-957.
*Kapuscinski, A.R., and E.M. Hallerman. 1991. Implications of introduction
of transgenic fish into natural ecosystems. Canadian Journal
of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (Supplement 1): 99-107.
Kohler, C.C., and W.R. Courtenay Jr. 1986. American Fisheries Society
position on introduction of aquatic species. Fisheries 11.
*Krueger, C.C., and B. May. 1991. Ecological and genetic effects
of salmonid introductions in North America. Canadian Journal
of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement 1): 66-77.
Leach, J.H., and C.A. Lewis. 1991. Fish introductions in Canada:
provincial views and regulations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries
and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement).
*Malakoff, David. 1998. Atlantic Salmon Spawn Fight Over Species
Protection. Science 279, February 6, 1998: 800.
Paul, Timothy J. Sinnott and Eric. 1993. Non-indigenous aquatic
species comprehensive management plan.
*Robinette, H.R., J. Hynes, N.C. Parker, R. Putz, R.E. Stevens,
and R.R. Stickney. 1991. Commercial aquaculture. Fisheries
16 (1): 18-22.
*Townsend, C.R., and M.J. Winterbourn. 1992. Assessment of the
environmental risk posed by an exotic fish: the proposed introduction
of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) to New Zealand. Conservation
Biology 6 (2).
Wingate, P.J. 1991. U.S. state's view and regulations on fish introductions,
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48 (supplement).
Government Documents
*Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. 1989. Fisheries
Management Report No. 13. p1-5.
The Bureau of Affairs, Inc. 1977. Executive Order 11987 - Exotic
Organisms.
*Connecticut Department of Agriculture. 1996. Connecticut laws
and practices concerning the transfer and introduction of mulluscan
shellfish.
*ICES. 1995. ICES Code of Practice on the Introductins and Transfers
of Marine Organisms 1994.
*Massachusettes Division of Marine Fisheries Policy: Acceptable
Sources of Molluscan Shellfish for Aquaculture 1996a.
*New York State Coastal Managment Program Summary. p1-4.
*+New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division
of Fish and Wildlife. 1993. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Comprehensive
Management Plan p1-38.
*Indicates MIT Sea Grant has reference on file. Please contact
us if you would like a copy.
+ Indicates a large sized document which MIT Sea Grant will send
on loan for a short period of time.
|