BALLAST WATER EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT ON THE WEST COAST OF THE UNITED
STATES
Karen Hart McDowell and Jodi Cassell, California Sea Grant Extension
Program
Key Words: ballast water, west coast, education
The California Sea Grant Extension Program started the West Coast Ballast
Outreach Project in February 1999. This project is funded by the National
Sea Grant College Program and the Cal-Fed Bay Delta Program. Since the
program's inception, various regulations that require specific ballast
water management protocols, ranging from the federal to the state level,
have been passed. This project has worked together with the maritime industry,
regulators, and researchers over the past two years to educate the various
groups on the recent developments and to coordinate management efforts
along the west coast.
The West Coast Ballast Outreach Project has sponsored a series of workshops,
produced a biannual newsletter, developed a web site, and produced a poster
and brochure to distribute information about the latest developments in
ballast water management and information on the impacts of aquatic nuisance
species. The ballast water forums were held at various locations along
the west coast, and were well attended by regulators and maritime industry
representatives. The three volumes of the newsletter, "Ballast Exchange,"
included updates on the various regulatory and research programs. The
web site includes information about the project, general information on
ballast water and aquatic nuisance species, and links to various ballast
water and aquatic nuisance species web sites. The poster and brochure,
"Stop Ballast Water Invasions," contain general information
about ballast water regulations and aquatic nuisances species. These documents
have been widely distributed to regulators and the maritime industry.
In addition to our educational efforts, the West Coast Ballast Outreach
Project has been actively involved with several working groups, the Pacific
Ballast Water Group, the Pacific Ballast Water Pilot Project, and the
Ballast Outreach Advisory Team. The Pacific Ballast Water Group, established
in 1998, is as ad-hoc group, made up of various stakeholders, to coordinate
ballast water management activities along the west coast. The Pacific
Ballast Water Pilot Project, established in 2000, is working to develop
ballast water treatment standards and to test various ballast water treatment
systems. The Ballast Outreach Advisory Team is made up of members representing
the maritime industry, regulatory agencies, and environmental groups.
We have worked closely with this team throughout this project to insure
that we are providing the proper educational information needed for these
groups to implement and comply with the various ballast water regulations.
As a result of these cooperative efforts, awareness of the impacts of
aquatic nuisance species and compliance with the various new ballast water
regulations has increased along the west coast.
Author to Contact: Karen Hart McDowell
California Sea Grant Extension Program/SFEP
1515 Clay Street
Suite 1400, Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: 510-622-2398
Fax: 510-622-2501
Email: kdhart@ucdavis.edu
www.ballast-outreach-ucsgep.ucdavis.edu
top
EVALUATING AND DISSEMINATING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SPREAD OF CAULERPA
TAXIFOLIA ALONG THE FRENCH MEDITERRANEAN COASTS
MEINESZ Alexandre, COTTALORDA Jean-Michel, CHIAVERINI Danièle,
THIBAUT Thierry and VAUGELAS de Jean.
Laboratoire Environnement Marin Littoral
Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis
Key Words: survey, detection, communication, Caulerpa taxifolia
From the first finding of 1 square meter of the tropical introduced algae
Caulerpa taxifolia (Vahl) C. Agardh to the present day situation which
involves 3184 hectares of the invasive alga along the French coasts, a
global strategy of detection, survey and communication of the spread has
been implemented.
The first step is a detection of the alga's presence. It became quickly
apparent that the alga covered a large region (in 1990 a colony was found
200 km west from the first spot). Since then, the detection and assessment
of the spread can no longer be carried out by scientists or other local
administrations. It was thus necessary to set up a public awareness campaign
with two main objectives:
- to inform proper the authorities of the presence of the alga
- to avoid disseminating the alga by way of boat anchors
To this end, frequent public awareness campaigns have been carried out
since 1991. These have allowed us to detect 80% of the newly colonized
zones (Cottalorda et al 1998). Each reported colonized zone is checked
by scientifically-trained SCUBA divers able to recognize the alga. In
order to follow the evolution of older and more extensive colonized zones,
transects were performed annually using a towed video camera (Belsher
1992).
The second step is a global evaluation of the spread. Each colonized
zone is very different, and depends on the lapse of time since initial
settlement. All of the intermediate situations can be observed, from a
single isolated and small colony of 1 square meter to a large infested
zone covering 15 km of coastline and present between depths of 0 to over
50 m. Each algal colony develops quickly, which necessitates a regular
monitoring of the situation. In light of the increasing difficulty in
both controlling the situation and performing the surveys, a standardization
of the monitoring protocol was proposed (Vaugelas et al. 1999). This standardized
protocol allows the situation to be assessed based on well defined descriptive
criteria that are adapted to both the nature of the colonized zone and
the monitoring efforts to be undertaken. This standardization is based
on three levels of invasion that correspond to three means of evaluating
the surface areas and length of coastline concerned by the invasive algal
spread. Using this standardization of the descriptive criteria, any changes
in the situation are easily described and can be compared from one year
to the next.
The last step concerns the communication of the information. From the
onset of this problem, efforts have been made to group all information
concerning the spread of this alga. Between 1984 and 1991, the number
of colonies increased dramatically. In order to keep both the concerned
authorities and sea-going persons informed, we published an annual report
from 1991 to 1998 that identified all of the invaded zones. In addition,
a report was drawn up for each newly discovered zone and sent to the government
and local authorities. By the end of the year 2000, over 90 zones were
concerned by the invasion. In order to render more accessible this information
and to avoid a tedious updating of the invasion information, an Internet
data bank has been created (http://www.unice.fr/LEML), which has been
called COL (Caulerpa on Line). At present, all persons interested and
concerned by this problem can access this data bank, in which each colonized
zone is described and a overview of its spread and corresponding maps
are provided.
These three steps allow a better and more efficient understanding of the
evolution of Caulerpa taxifolia spread, a phenomenon that has persisted
along the French Mediterranean coasts since 1984.
References
Belsher T., Youenou G., Dimeet J., Raillard J.-M., Bertrand S.and Mereau
N., 1995. Eléments cartographiques de Caulerpa taxifolia en Méditerranée
(Alpes-Maritimes et Monaco , 1992). Oceanol. Acta, 17 : 443-451.
Cottalorda J.M., Gravez V., Antolic B., Aranda A., Ballesteros E., Boudouresque
C.-F., Cassar N., Cinelli F., Darder Ribot J. D., Orestano C.,Grau Jofre
A., Jaklin A., Meinesz A., Rodriguez-Pietro C., Span A., Thibaut T., Vaujelas
de J., Zavodnik N.,and Zuljevic A., 1998 Third international Workshop
on Caulerpa taxifolia Boudouresque C.-F., Gravez V., Meinesz A. and Palluy
edit, GIS Posidonie publ., 9-16.
Vaugelas de J., Meinesz A., Antolic B., Ballesteros E., Belsher T., Cassar
N., Ceccherelli G., Cinelli F., Cottalorda J.-M., Frada-Orestano C., Grau
A.m., Jaklin A., Morucci C., Relini M., Sandulli R., Span A., Tripaldi
G., Van Klaveren P., Zavodnik N., Zuljevic A., 1999, Standardization proposal
for the mapping of Caulerpa taxifolia expansion in the Mediterranean Sea.
Oceanol. Acta, 22 85-94.
Author to contact: Prof. A. MEINESZ,
Laboratoire Environnement Marin Littoral
Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis
06108 Nice Cedex 2
France
e-mail: meinesz@unice.fr
tel: 33 4 92 07 68 46
fax: 33 4 92 07 68 49
top
TRANSFERRING SEA GRANT AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES RESEARCH AND OUTREACH
RESULTS TO THE NATION USING A WORLD WIDE WEB SERVER (SGNIS)
Brian K. Miller, Assistant Director, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant,
Purdue University, 1200 Forest Products Bldg. West Lafayette IN 47907-1200.
Phone (765) 494-3586. Fax (765) 496-6026. Email bmiller@fnr.purdue.edu.
Key words: Nonindigenous species, aquatic nuisance species,
www, outreach
Congressional action in response to the invasion of zebra mussels and
other aquatic nuisance species in the Great Lakes led to the passage of
the Non-indigenous Species Control Act of 1990 and resulted in over $17
million being spent by Sea Grant on research and outreach projects. The
growing wealth of information resulting from these projects is of high
value as aquatic nuisance species move to other regions of the country.
The work of the Sea Grant programs can help others to respond more rapidly
by applying research findings to control strategies and by using the richness
of the educational materials available to teach industry and resource
management agencies. This is one of the few genuinely peer-reviewed sites
on the web. Great care has been taken to ensure that all materials are
of the highest quality and to make sure that all information is searchable
and easily accessible to the end user. This site exemplifies how technology
will be transferred in the future. Researchers and other users can conduct
a literature search (as is done on searchable library databases) and in
addition can download the entire document or product on demand. This moves
the transfer of scientific technology one step further and makes application
and use of scientific information quicker and easier.
The SGNIS web site contains high-quality science and has been the web
presence for the National Sea Grant College Program on non-indigenous
issues since 1996. All documents contained on the site, both research
and outreach, have bee subjected to peer review. People who use the site
can be confident that the available materials are of the highest quality.
To date, the SGNIS database contains over 1100 research reports and educational
items. Currently housed at the site are over 428 completed research findings,
40 ongoing research abstracts, 312 research and outreach papers in six
conference proceedings, 85 issues of newsletters, a 70 slide graphic library,
53 general publications, 14 training materials and three distribution
maps. Contributions to SGNIS have been made by over 100 organizations
(20 of which are Sea Grant Programs) and 23 peer reviewed journals. Last
year SGNIS was accessed by users in 83 countries from government, universities,
and industries.
In 2000, a panel of Sea Grant outreach leaders and national office representatives
were engaged to develop a seamless interface by pulling all national Sea
Grant ANS web sites into a national web. Future additions to the site
include: 1) adding materials for additional Aquatic Nuisance Species,
2) enhancing and expanding an interactive kids section, 3) adding appropriate
gray literature to the site in topic areas where peer reviewed literature
is not available.
Author to contact: Brian K. Miller, Assistant Director
Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant, Purdue University
1200 Forest Products Bldg. West Lafayette IN 47907-1200
Phone (765) 494-3586
Fax (765) 496-6026
Email: bmiller@fnr.purdue.edu
top
DIRECT EFFECT OF A NONINDIGENOUS CICHLID (CICHLASOMA CYANOGUTTATUM)
ON REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF NATIVE CYPRINODON
June B. Mire, Ph.D.
Department of Biological Sciences
University of New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana
Stacey Byers
McGill School of Environment
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Keywords: nonindigenous, fish, direct effect, reproduction, cichlid
The Rio Grande cichlid (Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum) was introduced into
drainage canals in the New Orleans area in the early 1990s, and has since
spread throughout the canal system south of Lake Pontchartrain. Native
to northeastern Mexico and the lower Rio Grande, this cichlid can tolerate
low temperature and dissolved oxygen, as well as high salinity. Although
the invasive nature of the Rio Grande cichlid is well documented, and
circumstantial evidence suggests it displaced native fishes in the canals,
little is known about the direct effects of the cichlid on any native
fishes. We compared the reproductive success of the native Cyprinodon
variegatus in the presence and absence of young of the year Rio Grande
cichlids. Four female and three male adult Cyprinodon were placed in 10
pools outdoors and allowed to spawn freely. Nine young of the year Rio
Grande cichlids were added to half of the pools. Fish were matched for
size among controls and treatments. After 6 weeks, all fish were recovered
and preserved. Adult Cyprinodon and all cichlids were measured, and Cyprinodon
fry were counted. A strong direct negative effect of the cichlid on reproductive
success of Cyprinodon was shown. None of the 5 treatment pools yielded
fry. Follow-up experiments will also be discussed.
Author to contact: June B. Mire, Ph.D.
6813 Louisville Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70124
(504) 486-3883
Email: tucker9@bellsouth.net
top
A FRAMEWORK FOR EMPIRACLE RESEARCH ON ALIEN SPECIES
Kate Murphy and Greg Ruiz
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Key Words: ballast water, exchange, verification
A primary vector for the movement of aquatic organisms within and between
oceans is ships' ballast water. Although there are no systems in use today
that will prevent the introduction of aquatic nuisance species (ANS) with
ballast water, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) established
voluntary guidelines aimed at minimizing such introductions. The primary
method for reducing the risk of the introduction of nonindigenous species
into U.S coastal water is for ships to perform mid-ocean ballast water
exchange (BWE). During exchange, a vessel replaces its original ballast
water (taken on board while the vessel was in port or near to the coast)
with water from the open ocean. Ballast exchange reduces ANS by 1) discharging
a percentage of them into the inhospitable environment of the ocean, and
in some cases, 2) by increasing the salinity level within the ballast
tank to a level such that the species of freshwater or brackish water
origins cannot survive.
On May 10, 1993, the U.S. Coast Guard's ballast water management regulations
became effective for vessels traveling to the Great Lakes that operate
beyond the Canadian or the United States exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
These regulations mandate BWE as the current procedure to control the
introduction of nonindigenous species. Exchange is to take place in water
outside the 200 mile EEZ and in depths greater than 2000 meters.
On October 26, 1996, Congress enacted the National Invasive Species Act
of 1996 (NISA) (Pub. L. 104-332), which amended and reauthorized NANPCA.
NISA provides for ballast water management to prevent introductions and
spread of ANS. It expands the scope of Coast Guard regulations to include
all waters of the United States.
In compliance with NISA, the Coast Guard regulatory guidelines become
mandatory after three years unless the maritime industry shows a high
rate of compliance under a self-policing system. Therefore, the interim
rule establishes a ballast management reporting provision, which will
assist the Coast Guard in assessing compliance for the next two years.
Salinity measurements are currently used by the US Coast Guard to verify
ballast water exchange. In some cases, the presence of low salinity ballast
water (< 30 ppt) is sufficient to show that the water was not exchanged
in mid-ocean, however, the technique fails when the source of the ballast
is a high-salinity coastal port. In these situations, it is necessary
to identify more refined techniques to determine the origin of the ballast
water.
To address this problem, the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
(SERC) in conjunction with the United States Coast Guard (USCG) intiated
a program to investigate whether a suite of characteristics (chemical,
biological, physical or a combination of these) can be used to discriminate
between coastal and oceanic water and as such represent reliable indicators
of exchange, regardless of the salinity of the coastal source water.
A workshop was held at SERC in August 2000 to discuss potential techniques
for verifying BWE. The workshop was attended by representatives from SERC
and the USCG as well as a panel of nine invited experts. The expert panel
consisted of chemical and biological oceanographers who presented information
upon, and evaluated a diverse range of, potential verification techniques.
Of these, it was decided that DOM fluorescence, trace metals, turbidity,
lignin, radium and phytoplankton as well as the "Newcastle"
verification method demonstrated the most promise as verification tools
and were worthy of further investigation in this context.
To provide data on the suitability of each of these techniques for verifying
BWE, ballast water samples were collected from two vessels during voyages
to Alaska in November and December 2000. The first vessel left out of
San Francisco with ballast tanks containing low-salinity coastal water;
the second left out of Los Angeles with coastal water barely distinguishable
in terms of salinity from the surrounding ocean. Each vessel performed
a 300% flow through exchange in one tank, while keeping the 'partner'
tank as an unexchanged control. The first vessel performed an additional
100% empty refill exchange on a third tank.
Ballast water samples were collected and insitu measurements performed
before and after the exchanges with mid-ocean water took place. Samples
were sent to various specialist US laboratories for analysis. In this
presentation, we discuss some intial results of the two ballast water
exchange verification experiments, and future directions for this program.
Author to Contact: Kate Murphy
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
647 Contees Wharf Rd, Edgewater, MD 21037
Tel: 443 482 2361
Fax: 443 482 2380
top
THE ASIAN SHORE CRAB HEMIGRAPSUS SANGUINEUS IN NEW ENGLAND: CHANGES
IN RESIDENT CRAB POPULATIONS?
Nancy J. O'Connor,
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Key Words: Asian shore crab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus, Carcinus maenas,
mud crabs, population ecology
Documenting ecosystem changes resulting from the establishment of biological
invaders requires an understanding of the system before, during, and after
colonization of the invader. Biological invasions that are currently in
progress provide the best opportunity for this type of assessment. However,
such comparative data exist for few species.
The Asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus is currently becoming established
along the rocky intertidal coastline of New England. First noticed in
New Jersey in 1988 (McDermott 1991), the crab was well established in
southern New England by 1996 (Lohrer and Whitlatch 1997, Ledesma and O'Connor
in press). Currently, the species' range extends to New Hampshire (McDermott,
pers. comm.), with populations along the Massachusetts coastline continuing
to grow in size.
H. sanguineus occurs throughout the rocky intertidal zone, reaching maximum
densities in the mid to lower intertidal zone. Resident crab species,
such as green crabs (Carcinus maenas, which is also non-indigenous), mud
crabs in the family Xanthidae, and rock crabs (Cancer spp.) also inhabit
the lower rocky intertidal zone. The objective of the study was to determine
whether populations of these crabs are affected as H. sanguineus becomes
established. Specifically, I asked whether densities of other crab species
tend to decrease as densities of H. sanguineus increase.
Crab populations in several localities were sampled repeatedly, usually
in the spring (May to early June) and fall (September to October) to examine
temporal changes in crab populations and to determine whether any changes
observed were similar at different locations. Sites sampled include Bristol,
Rhode Island, in Narragansett Bay, and several sites along the Massachusetts
coast: Washburn Island, Falmouth, in Vineyard Sound; Bourne, near the
east end of the Cape Cod Canal; Sandwich and Dennis in Cape Cod Bay; and
Marshfield and Scituate on the shore south of Boston. Three to five replicate
2m2 square quadrats were randomly placed on rocky (= 75% rock cover) areas
low in the intertidal zone during low tide. All crabs were removed from
the quadrats, identified, counted, measured in most cases, and then returned
to the sampling site. Sampling began in 1996 at Sandwich and Washburn
Island, and from 1997-1999 at the other locations.
The most abundant species at the sites were xanthid crabs, C. maenas,
and H. sanguineus. Cancer spp., when present, usually occurred in very
low densities (< 1 crab/m2). During initial sampling in Bristol and
Washburn Island, xanthids were the most abundant and H. sanguineus occurred
at low densities (< 5/m2). However, within two years the dominance
pattern switched, with H. sanguineus reaching densities of 30-50/m2 and
xanthids falling to < 2/m2. At Sandwich and Bourne, H. sanguineus abundance
increased over 2-4 years, reaching densities of 76/m2 in Sandwich and
120/m2 in Bourne by fall 2000. C. maenas densities remained low (<
10/m2). At Dennis, C. maenas was the most abundant species in fall of
1997, although its density was low (5/m2). By fall of 1998, H. sanguineus
became (and remained) the most abundant species, with densities fluctuating
around 15/m2. North of Cape Cod, in Marshfield and Scituate, C. maenas
remained the dominant crab species. However, C. maenas densities declined
in Marshfield between 1999 and 2000 whereas H. sanguineus densities increased.
Sampling planned in 2001 should determine whether this trend continues.
Size-frequency distributions of C. maenas and H. sanguineus showed temporal
patterns. For both species, especially C. maenas, the populations were
dominated by small crabs (< 8 mm carapace width) in the fall, indicating
a recent recruitment period. H. sanguineus populations also contained
several small crabs in May-early June, suggesting a spring as well as
late summer-fall period of recruitment.
In summary, the establishment of H. sanguineus has negatively affected
the abundance of xanthid crabs, although the mechanism is unknown. H.
sanguineus might be impacting C. maenas, because densities are low where
H. sanguineus is abundant. However, future sampling at Scituate and Marshfield,
where C. maenas currently dominates, is necessary to determine whether
C. maenas densities will decline if H. sanguineus populations grow in
size.
References:
Ledesma, M.E. and N.J. O'Connor. 2001. Habitat and diet of the non-native
crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus in southeastern New England. Northeastern
Naturalist (in press)
Lohrer, A.M. and R.B. Whitlatch. 1997. Ecological studies on the recently
introduced Japanese shore crab (Hemigrapsus sanguineus) in eastern Long
Island Sound. Pp. 49-60 in N. Balcom (ed.). Proceedings of the Second
Northeast Conference on Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Species. Connecticut
Sea Grant College Program CTSG-97-02, 68 pp.
McDermott, J.J. 1991. A breeding population of the Western Pacific crab
Hemigrapsus sanguineus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) established on
the Atlantic coast of North America. Biological Bulletin 181: 195-198
Author to Contact: Nancy J. O'Connor
Department of Biology and School for Marine Science and Technology
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
285 Old Westport Road
N. Dartmouth, MA 02747-2300, USA
Tel: 508-999-8217
Fax: 508-999-8196
Email: noconnor@umassd.edu
top
THE NATIONAL AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES CLEARINGHOUSE AND SEARCHABLE
ELECTRONIC DATABASE
Tom Maddox, author and presenter
T.L. Maddox Companies, Inc.
Key Words: Management - Ballast Water, Sonics and Ozone
Stakeholders interested in the introduction, spread, potential impacts,
and control of aquatic nuisance, nonindigenous, and invasive species require
timely, reliable scientific information and fast, easy access to published
research pertaining to such organisms. Since August 1990, they have been
able to obtain such information from Sea Grant's Zebra Mussel Information
Clearinghouse. For seven years, the Clearinghouse was "just"a
zebra mussel Clearinghouse, with North America's most extensive technical
library of published research, "grey literature," and other
relevant documentation pertaining to all facets of the zebra mussel issue.
That was then, this is now.
The Clearinghouse has undergone extensive and exciting changes since mid-1997,
resulting in the name change to the "National Aquatic Nuisance Species
Clearinghouse." The mission of the Clearinghouse is: to facilitate
and coordinate aquatic nuisance, nonindigenous, and invasive species information
sharing among researchers throughout North America and worldwide; to provide
continuity to the timely dissemination of findings of aquatic nuisance,
nonindigenous, and invasive species research projects; and to facilitate
aquatic nuisance, nonindigenous, and invasive species prevention and control
technology transfer between researchers and stakeholder audiences. The
Clearinghouse serves as a major link between the research community and
a wide array of university, government agency, industrial, and special
interest stakeholders. The Clearinghouse also plays a high?profile role
as a primary nexus for identifying completed, current, and proposed aquatic
nuisance, nonindigenous, and invasive species research activities and
for linking researchers with similar interests.
The Clearinghouse now addresses both marine and freshwater aquatic nuisance,
nonindigenous, and invasive species throughout the Gulf of Maine, Northern
Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, Southern Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Central and
Northern California, Pacific Northwest, and Great Lakes regions, and North
American inland river and lacustrine systems. The Clearinghouse has added
to its library and searchable database, including the following organisms:
zebra and "quagga" mussels (Dreissena polymorpha and D. bugensis),
the Amur River Corbula (Potamocorbula amurensis), the Asian clam (Corbicula
fluminea), the Asian mussel (Musculista senhousia), the Atlantic green
crab (Carcinus maenas), the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis), the blueback
herring (Alosa aestivalis), the brown mussel (Perna perna), the Chinese
mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis), the dark false mussel (Mytilopsis leucophaeata),
the Eurasian ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus), the "fishhook water flea"
(Cercopagis pengoi), the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), the green
lipped mussel (Perna viridis), gribbles (Limnoria spp.), the golden mussel
(Limnoperna fortunei), the round and tube?nose gobies (Neogobius melanostomus
and Proterorhinus marmoratus), the New Zealand mud snail (Potamopyrgus
antipodarum), the rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), shipworms (Teredo
navalis), Sphaeroma quoyanum, the spiny water flea (Bythotrephes cederstroemi),
the Suminoe oyster (Crassostrea ariakensis), and the veined Rapa whelk
(Rapana venosa), as well as biological macrofouling, aquatic exotic organism,
and invasive species policy issues.
All of the information in the Clearinghouse is accessible to any researcher,
agency, industry, utility, student, or other individual or group having
need of the information via electronic mail, fax, toll? or toll?free telephone,
written requests, or visits to the Clearinghouse. A new, searchable electronic
database of the Clearinghouse's Technical Library Bibliography is now
available on the Clearinghouse's World Wide Web home page. Citations include:
author(s), title, document source and date, an annotation, whether the
document is a journal article or other type of publication, document length,
the language in which the document is written, whether the document is
available on interlibrary loan from the Clearinghouse or direct from some
other source, and the copying/mailing fee if the document is available
from the Clearinghouse. The database is keyword searchable (via a 170+
keyword, four level search outline). Most documents are available directly
from the Clearinghouse on interlibrary loan and can be ordered on?line.
The World Wide Web address for the database is: http://cce.cornell.edu/seagrant/nansc/.
The web site also contains a series of detailed maps charting the range
expansion of the zebra mussel and the "quagga" mussel in North
America since 1989, as well as information on a number of other informational
and educational materials available from the Clearinghouse and numerous
"hot links" to other aquatic nuisance, nonindigenous, and invasive
species web sites.
The Federal Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Zebra Mussel Research Program, the Great Lakes and Western Panels
on Aquatic Nuisance Species, the Western Zebra Mussel Task Force, and
numerous other federal, state, and international agencies and institutions
have utilized the Clearinghouse as a major channel for extending information
on zebra mussel, aquatic nuisance, nonindigenous, and invasive species
spread, research, and policy initiatives to all interested audiences.
Author to Contact: Tom Maddox
Phone: 636-394-8161 800-960-8161
Fax: 636-394-6776
Email: tlmaddox@aol.com
Website: www.z-mussels.com
top
SALINITY TOLERANCE OF LARVAL RAPANA VENOSA: IMPLICATIONS FOR DISPERSAL
AND ESTABLISHMENT RANGE ON THE U.S. EAST COAST
Charles R. O'Neill, Jr.
Senior Extension Associate, New York Sea Grant
The lack of quantitative data on environmental tolerances of early life
history stages hinders estimation of both dispersal rates and establishment
ranges for invading species in receptor environments. This is particularly
evident in consideration of invading species with pelagic larval life
history phases where the pelagic stage effects most if not all of the
dispersal at the time frame of a single generation. We present salinity
tolerance data for all stages of the ontogenetic larval development of
the invading predatory gastropod Rapana venosa. We propose that salinity
tolerance is the dominant response controlling potential dispersal (=
invasion) range of the species into the estuaries of the Atlantic coast
of the United States. Salinity tolerance is then examined in conjunction
with temperature, which dictates both periodicity of adult egg laying
and larval development rate, and extant nearshore and estuarine current
data, to estimate rates of dispersal and range expansion from the current
invading epicenter in the southern Chesapeake Bay. All larval stages exhibit
48 hr tolerance to salinities as low as 15 ppt with minimal mortality.
Below this value survival grades to no survival at less than 10 ppt. This
tolerance is greater than of the adults of the large native predatory
gastropods of the genera Busycon and Busycotypus with which, we predict,
Rapana will compete directly for space and prey, notably infaunal pelecypods.
We predict that counter clockwise, gyre-like circulation within the Chesapeake
Bay will initially distribute larvae northward along the bay side of the
DelMarVa peninsula, and eventually to the lower sections of all the major
subestuaries of the western shore of the bay. The discovery in summer
2000 of small (80 mm as opposed to adult specimens of >160 mm maximum
dimension) Rapana at the along the northerly leg of this gyre adds weight
to the predicted dispersal route. Dispersal onto and along the coastal
shelf outside of the bay mouth may be influenced by both northward and
southward flowing residual current depending on depth, wind conditions,
and time within the known egg laying period of the invader in the southern
Chesapeake Bay. Establishment over a period of decades from Cape Cod to
Cape Hatteras by natural dispersal is considered a high probability. This
time frame may, however, be considerably reduced by passive dispersal
of larval forms in ballast water during intra-coastal maritime trade.
Author to Contact: Charles R. O'Neill, Jr.
Senior Extension Associate, New York Sea Grant
Director, National Aquatic Nuisance Species Clearinghouse
Morgan II, State University College
Brockport, NY 14420
Phone: (716) 395-2638 Fax: (716) 395-2466
E-mail: cro4@cornell.edu
top
I
NO LONGER A PRISTINE CONFINE OF THE WORLD OCEAN-A SURVEY OF EXOTIC MARINE
SPECIES IN THE SOUTHWESTERN ATLANTIC
Orensanz1 JM, Bortolus2 A, Casas1
G, Darrigran3 G, Elías2 R, López Gappa4
JJ, Obenat2 S, Pascual5 M, Pastorino4
G, Penchaszadeh4 P, Piriz1 ML, Scarabino6
F, Schwindt2,7 E, Spivak2 ED and Vallarino2
EA
1Centro Nacional Patagónico, Puerto Madryn, Argentina,
2Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina,
3Universidad Nacional La Plata, La Plata, Argentina, 4Museo
Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "B. Rivadavia", Buenos Aires,
Argentina, 5Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera,
San Antonio Oeste, Argentina, 6INAPE, Montevideo, Uruguay,
7Contact person: CC82, Correo Central, (7600), Mar del Plata,
Argentina, schwindt@mdp.edu.ar.
Key Words: Southwestern Atlantic, pristine areas.
The southwestern Atlantic is often regarded as a comparatively pristine
confine of the World Ocean. Yet, if man-induced changes in the biodiversity
tapestry of coastal seascapes are considered, a closer look at those regions
could reveal a different picture could be observed. To that end, we formed
an e-discussion group of Argentinean and Uruguayan scientists within which
information was exchanged and screened in preparation for a working group
meeting that took place concurrently with the 3rd Jornadas Argentinas
de Ciencias del Mar (Puerto Madryn, Argentina, September 11-15, 2000).
The objectives were: (a) To compile all the evidence about the introduction
of exotics in a region of the World Ocean where marine biodiversity is
very poorly documented and (b) To develop a holistic, "big picture"
of how coastal seascapes of the southwestern Atlantic have changed as
a result of ecologically significant invasions. The geographic domain
covered by our review corresponds to the coastal zone south of the Brazil/Uruguay
border (34o SL), down to the southern end of the continent and its adjacencies
(54o SL).
Criteria for Inclusion: (a) species whose "exotic" status is
well documented and (b) species that are reasonable candidates to the
status of invasive exotics. The second group requires the specification
of criteria for inclusion; five were considered: (1) Wide geographic distribution,
including "cosmopolitic" species and species showing biogeographically
incongruous distribution ranges, (2) Invasive potential indicated by documented
exotic status in other geographic regions, (3) The species is abundant
in the vicinity of presumable centers of introduction (e.g. commercial
harbors), but rare in (or absent from) the rest of the region, (4) Life
history suggests high long-distance dispersive potential, particularly
for rafting on man-made structures, (5) In the case of species with hard
parts, absence from the Quaternary fossil record, which in this region
is rich and has been well documented.
Criteria for Exclusion: (a) Anadromous salmonids, as we have concentrated
on benthic/littoral organisms, (b) Wood-borers, (c) Species that within
the study area are exclusively associated with floating object, (d) Hydrozoa
with a medusa stage, (e) Invasive species present only on the freshwater
end of estuarine environments and (f) Exotics recorded for Brazil, but
not from Uruguay/Argentina.
The emerging "big picture" showed that the impact of recent,
human-mediated biological invasions has had, already, a significant ecological
impact. Between the most important invasive species detected were: Ficopomatus
enigmaticus, Limnoperna fortunei, Crassostrea gigas, Balanus glandula,
and Undaria pinnatifida and one exported invasive species (Spartina densiflora)
The results are summarized in tables with: (1) 28 species for which the
exotic status is well documented and which belong to the following groups:
Phaeophyta 1, Polychaeta 4, Mollusca 4, Arthropoda 9, Ectoprocta 5 and
Chordata 5, (2) Likely candidates to the exotic status (with 50 species)
and they are: Porifera 4, Cnidaria Polychaeta 12, Mollusca 1, Arthropoda
17, Ectoprocta 4 and Chordata 1. (3) Species presumably native to the
region under consideration, that have been recorded as exotic in (distant)
regions and they are: Porifera 1, Mollusca 2 and Poacea 1.
There are well known cases of species that went exting in a given region,
but were later re-introduced by man-mediated Three prominent cases fall
in this category: Crepidula aculeata, Petricolaria (=Petricola) pholadiformis
and Balanus amphitrite.
Our survey of invasions of the southwestern Atlantic by exotic species,
the first of its nature for this region, had results unexpected to us
at the onset of the project. Most coastal ecosystems between the La Plata
River estuary (35º SL) and Golfo Nuevo (43º SL) have been already
modified, or are expected to be so in the short term. Only exposed sandy
beaches appear to be free from the pervasive ecological impact of biological
invasion by exotic species. It is becoming increasingly difficult to establish
what the pristine condition of coastal communities was. The results of
the survey reveal that (1) all the four invading animal species that have
already had a significant ecological impact tend to concentrate in crowded
patches and have pelagic larvae and (2) there is a sharp contrast in the
impact of invasive species at equivalent latitudes along the two coasts
of southern South America.
Most introductions were accidental, most likely associated with fouled
objects or ballast water discharges. We hope that our compilation will
assist in the implementation of more proactive policies. Given that the
biodiversity of the southwestern Atlantic is among the least known in
the World, it is important that scientists and scientific agencies in
the region understand the urgency of research on systematic and biogeography.
Author to Contact: Orensanz
Centro Nacional Patagónico, Puerto Madryn, Argentina
top
MODELING THE EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUESES OF SPECIES INVASIONS: CAN NATIVE
PREY ADAPT IN TIME TO AVOID EXTINCTION?
Deborah Pakes -University of Guelph (Graduate student)
Elizabeth Boulding -University of Guelph
Key Words: predator invasions, rapid adaptation, marine ecology, gene
flow, evolution
Ecological effects of invading predatory species, such as crowding competition
and displacement of native organisms have been well studied and are known
to be important both economically and ecologically. Evolutionary effects
of invasive predators such as causing life history changes or extinctions
are less well known. Endemic prey species may not be able to evolve defenses
against specialized predator and will go extinct unless they can quickly
adapt. Rapid adaptation due to predators has been shown to cause changes
in life history traits as quickly as 18 generations in experiments with
guppies (Resnick 1997). In field experiments that have dealt with predator
prey interactions, removal experiments are more common than introductions
(Sih et al 1985). This work entails the addition of predatory shore crabs
(Hemigrapsis nudus) to wave exposed rocky intertidal shores where they
do not naturally inhabit by building shelters for them. We are in the
process of developing techniques to monitor demographic and population
parameters to predict whether local snail populations (Littorina sp.)
will go extinct after the invasion using a model developed by Boulding
and Hay (in review). These shore crabs have been found to selectively
prey on thinner shelled snails, and forage mainly within 3 meters of their
shelters. After adding crabs to selected field sites we can monitor the
parameters needed for the model which include: prey population size, prey
population growth rate, heritability of a quantitative trait under selection
(shell thickness), phenotypic variance of that trait, the strength of
selection by the predator, and gene flow from neighboring prey populations
subject to different selection pressures. The present research focuses
on development of techniques to measure the later two parameters in order
to be able to manipulate the system and monitor the evolutionary changes
in the prey after the additions of predators. We have found that the strength
of selection is dependant on the predator size and needs to be measured
separately for each invading size class in order to get an accurate idea
of the intensity of selection pressure. The large crabs are less selective
on shell thickness than the small crabs. Using this information we can
also manipulate the selection pressure experimentally by adding large
or small crabs to various sites. We have also found that the snail neighborhood
size is roughly the same area as the crabs foraging range (about 3 meters).
We are unsure as to whether migration from other snail populations experiencing
different selection pressure is a constraint to local adaptation. Future
experiments, now that all parameters are measurable, will focus on this
aspect and will attempt to highlight which parameters are most important
in determining whether local native populations will adapt or go extinct
after the invasion of an exotic predator. This work will allow the testing
of current models in predicting the evolutionary effects of invading organisms
in the intertidal as well as other ecosystems subject to invasions, which
are becoming more common because of human activity.
Author to contact: Deborah Pakes -University of Guelph (Graduate student)
Elizabeth Boulding -University of Guelph
Presenter/contact
Deborah Pakes
Departement of Zoology
University of Guelph
N1G 2W1
Fax: 519 -767-1656
top
FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DSITRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF THE EXOTIC SEASTAR
ASTERIAS AMURENSIS DURING THE EARLY PHASE OF ITS ESTABLISHMENT IN PORT
PHILLIP BAY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Gregory D. Parry and Brian F. Cohen
Key Words: Asterias, early invasion, spread, control
The establishment of the exotic northern Pacific seastar Asterias amurensis
in
Tasmania attracted a great deal of publicity and significantly increased
awareness of the impact of exotic marine species throughout Australia.
During
the 1990s A. amurensis became the most conspicuous organism in the Derwent
estuary and by 1995 its population was approximately 28 million (Grannum
et al.
1996). Field studies in the Derwent confirmed that A. amurensis preyed
on a wide
range of native fauna and that densities were as high as 24/m2. Consequently
A.
amurensis was considered to have the potential to profoundly affect native
communities in southern Australia (Ross and Johnson 1998)
Asterias amurensis is native to the coasts of Japan and southeastern
Russia.
During the mid 1990s A. amurensis was confined to the Derwent estuary
and
hydrological modelling suggested that this limited distribution was the
result
of limited larval dispersal (Bruce 1998). However the distribution of
A.
amurensis in Tasmania still has not extended significantly beyond the
Derwent
estuary and more recent modelling (C. Johnson, Univ Tasmania, pers comm)
suggests that most larvae are flushed from the estuary, and hence biological
factors may be limiting the spread of A. amurensis. Between 1995 and 1997
four
adult A. amurensis were collected in Port Phillip Bay and in early 1998
many
juveniles were found (Parry et al. 2000). Studies of population genetics
indicates that the Port Phillip Bay population probably came from the
population
in the Derwent (Murphy and Evans 1998). These two populations are 700
km apart
and no A. amurensis have been found at intermediate locations. This distribution
pattern and the prevailing currents (Bruce 1998) suggest that natural
dispersal
of larvae from the Derwent to Port Phillip Bay is very unlikely. Vessels
travelling between Hobart and Melbourne are the most likely vector, but
it is
uncertain whether A. amurensis were introduced as larvae in ballast water
or
adults. That the first four animals were found 10s of km apart and all
were
adults spawned in at least two different years (Parry et al. 2000) suggests
that
these first arrivals were transported as adults. In contrast, when juveniles
were first found in early 1998, many individuals of the same age were
found in
the same region. Such a distribution pattern would be expected if these
seastars
resulted from larval settlement following a successful spawning in the
bay, or
possibly following the discharge of ballast water containing a high density
of
A. amurensis larvae.
Most studies of exotic species do not commence until a population is
well enough
established to present an economic or environmental problem. Typically
this
occurs once the exotic species is well established, some years after the
initial
invasion. Studies in the Derwent followed this typical pattern and did
not
commence until A. amurensis had been established for approximately a decade
(Byrne et al. 1997). However the presence of A. amurensis in the Derwent
and its
apparent impact there (McLoughlin and Thresher 1994) heightened awareness
of the
risk of its translocation to Port Phillip Bay and resulted in the commencement
of ecological studies of A. amurensis in the Bay during the early phase
of its
establishment.
Studies during the early phase of the invasion are critical to provide
a
baseline against which impacts may be measured. But it appears to be less
well
appreciated that some insights into means of controlling pest species
may only
be evident during the early phase of an invasion. Factors that control
the
distribution and abundance of pest species may change irreversibly as
the pest
becomes more abundant.
This study documents changes in the distribution and population dynamics
of
Asterias amurensis during the early phase of an invasion. The population
of A.
amurensis in Port Phillip Bay has grown from 300,000 in 1998 to 30 million
in
1999 to approximately 100 million in 2000. The mortality rate of seastars
during
their first three years in Port Phillip Bay has remained very low in the
main
area of infestation, but annual somatic growth has declined so that changes
in
seastar diameter decreased from 15 cm/year in 1998 to 8 cm/year in 1999.
In 2000
the reproductive output in the main area of the infestation is only one
third of
that during 1999. Growth in the main area of infestation appears density
dependent. The distribution of A. amurensis in Port Phillip Bay has been
influenced strongly by hydrodynamic factors. Hydrodynamic models suggest
that
limited larval dispersal explains the absence of A. amurensis from western
Port
Phillip Bay in the period 1997-2000. However native predators may be limiting
the spread of A. amurensis into southern regions and shallow regions on
the east
of the Bay.
References
Bruce, B. (1998). A summary of CSIRO studies on the larval ecology of
Asterias
amurensis. Proceedings of a meeting on the biology and management of the
introduced seastar Asterias amurensis in Australian waters. C. L. Goggin
(Ed).
CSIRO, Hobart, CRIMP Technical Report. 15: 36-41.
Byrne, M., M. G. Morrice, Wolf, B. (1997).
?Introduction of the northern Pacific
asteroid Asterias amurensis to Tasmania: reproduction and current distribution.?
Marine Biology 127: 673-685.
Grannum, R. K., Murfet, N. B., Ritz, D. A., Turner, E. (1996). Part 2.
The
distribution and impact of the exotic seastar, Asterias amurensis (Lutken)
in
Tasmania. The introduced northern Pacific seastar, Asterias amurensis
(Lutken),
in Tasmania, Australian Nature Conservation Agency.
McLoughlin, R., Thresher, R. (1994). ?The north Pacific seastar, Australia's
most damaging marine pest?? Search 25: 69-71.
Murphy, N. Evans, B. (1998). Genetic origin of Australian populations
of
Asterias amurensis. Proceedings of a meeting on the biology and management
of
the introduced seastar Asterias amurensis in Australian waters. C. L.
Goggin
(Ed). CSIRO, Hobart, CRIMP Technical Report. 15: 22-25.
Parry, G. D., Cohen, B.F., McArthur, M. A., Hickman, N. J. (2000). Asterias
amurensis incursion in Port Phillip Bay: Status at May 1999. Queenscliff,
Marine
and Freshwater Resources Institute Report No: 21.
Ross, J., Johnson, C. (1998). Invasiveness and impact of the northern
Pacific
seastar Asterias amurensis on natural communities in S.E. Tasmania. Proceedings
of a meeting on the biology and management of the introduced seastar Asterias
amurensis in Australian waters. CSIRO, Hobart, CRIMP Technical Report
15: 13-17.
Author to contact: Gregory D. Parry* and Brian F. Cohen
Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute
PO Box 114
Queenscliff 3225
Phone 0011 63 5258 0334 Fax 0011 63 5258 0270.
email: greg.parry@nre.vic.gov.au
top
RAPID ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF NONINDIGENOUS SPECIES IN COASTAL MASSACHUSETTS
Judith Pederson1, Robert Bullock2, Dale Calder3,
James Carlton4, John Chapman5, Andrew Cohen6,
Harlan Dean7, Peter Dyrynda8, Larry Harris9,
Charles Lambert10, Gretchen Lambert10, Arthur Mathieson9,
Seth Tyler11, and Judith Winston12
1MIT Sea Grant College Program, Cambridge, MA; 2University
of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI; 3Royal Ontario Museum,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 4Williams College-Mystic Seaport
Maritime Program, Mystic, CT; 5Oregon State University Hatfield
Marine Center, Newport, OR; 6San Francisco Estuary Institute,
Richmond, CA; 7Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology,
Cambridge, MA; 8University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK;
9University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH; 10Seattle,
Washington; 11University of Maine, Orono, ME; 12Virginia
Museum of Natural History, Martinsville, VA
Key Words: Southwestern Atlantic, pristine areas.
Using an approach initiated on the West Coast, a Rapid Assessment Survey
of marine native and non-native species in shallow water float communities
of Massachusetts was conducted from August 6-11, 2000. Twenty sites from
Gloucester to Fall River, Massachusetts were visited by scientists, students
and participants with broad and specific taxonomic backgrounds. The Massachusetts
survey was followed by a comparable one in Rhode Island the following
week with many of the same scientists participating in that survey.
Although identifications are not complete for the Massachusetts study,
157 invertebrate species and 84 algal species were identified. Of the
total species identified, 20 (4 plant and 16 invertebrate) species are
considered to be introduced and another 25 (1 plant and 24 invertebrate)
species are classified as cryptogenic. The total number of marine nonindigenous
species in Massachusetts is less than the numbers observed in Puget Sound
(38 marine nonindigenous species) and San Francisco Bay (>200 marine,
brackish, and freshwater nonindigenous species).
Most species are found throughout the coast of Massachusetts, but a few
are limited to either north or south of Cape Cod, which divides the southern
Virginian and northern Boreal Provinces.
The data and information from this study are being used to develop the
marine portion of the Massachusetts Aquatic Invasive Species Management
Plan. As additional information is added, a more comprehensive examination
of the historical and current records of introductions will provide insight
into whether more species are being introduced today compared to previous
decades. As the data from Rhode Island survey become available, the information
will be incorporated into a regional database that also will include the
Gulf of Maine.
Author to Contact: Judith Pederson
MIT Sea Grant College Program, Cambridge, MA
top
FEEDING AND SUBSTRATE PREFERENCES OF THE JAPANESE SHORE CRAB, HEMIGRAPSUS
SANGUINEUS
S.R. Percival and K. Wilson, Ph.D., Dept of Biological Sciences,
CCSU
Keywords: Hemigrapsus sanguineus, introduced species, diet, substrate
Hemigrapsus sanguineus, the Japanese shore crab, is native to the Western
Pacific Ocean and was first observed in Long Island Sound in 1992. Since
then, it has become firmly established and, in many locations, is the
most common crab in the rocky intertidal zone. Based on field observations,
experiments were designed to determine substrate preference and aspects
of the diet of the crab. Crabs were collected from Connecticut rocky shores,
sexed and measured, and grouped together in three size classes (6-12mm,
13-19mm, and 20-26mm) in the lab. Experiments were conducted to determine
the influence of crab sex or size on 1) preference for cobble substrate
size and 2) preference for specific size ranges of the northern rock barnacle,
Semibalanus balanoides. Individual crabs from each size class were simultaneously
offered three different substrate sizes (<1cm, 2 cm, and 5 cm). In
the feeding experiment, crabs were allowed to feed individually on a range
of sizes of barnacles for 24 hours. Results indicate that neither sex
nor carapace size of the Japanese shore crab is associated with a preference
for substrate size. Most crabs preferred the five cm substrate. In the
feeding experiment, neither sex nor carapace size of the crabs was associated
with a preference for barnacle size. Most crabs fed on all of the barnacles.
Author to contact: Scott R. Percival
Berlin Senior High School-Science Faculty
139 Patterson Way, Berlin, CT 06037
Phone: 860-828-6577 ext. 239
Fax: 860-225-8580
email: percivalsr@aol.com
top
|